On Friday 27 July 2007 13:25:26 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >>> OpenMoko-0.5 or whatever scheme is already in place. > >> > >> -2007 and -2008 so far. We might have 200x.y at some point. > > Hm. I think using year-names is not a good choice for software > versions (mainly talking about stable releases). > It psychologically forces you to do one major release every year. But > if you do it twice a year you run into troubles.
I don't think Ubuntu did very badly with (Y)Y.MM release naming. Except for the Dapper slippage maybe, but that was warranted by any means... Plus you can use future dates for unstable (right now the next Ubuntu release is 7.10
pgpPhEgMGS19X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
