The iPhone killer, competitor, or comparisons you have been describing - to
me - should not be done against the neo.
I happen to think that the neo is indeed an anti-iphone. Unfortunately a lot of people confuse this position with the idea that the neo is an iPhone killer - something entirely different. An iPhone killer would be a phone that takes on the iPhone in its target market - nontechnical style mongers - and surpasses it. The neo is not that phone. An anti-iPhone, to my mind, is a phone that is open to one and all to develop for it. A phone without barriers to its use, without corporate controls and without toll gates. That's what makes the neo special, not its touchscreen, its round shape, its GPS even. The problem is that people confuse the anti-iPhone and iPhone-killer concepts so much. This subtle distinction is lost in the rush to blogging sensationalism. So it this light maybe the iPhone should be left out of the rhetoric entirely, when possible. Let's not forget that the neo is also the anti-razr, anti-ming, anti-nokia. Its the anti-samsung, anti-blackberry. In fact, whatever phone you have, its anti-that-too. The only exception would be maybe the greenphone, only if i remember correctly that requires some extra payment to become a developer. So I guess the neo is the anti-greenphone as well.


_______________________________________________
OpenMoko community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Reply via email to