On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 02 June 2008 15:11:17 Bin Chen wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: >> >> I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition >> >> has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during the wait time >> >> of the response, another unsolicited command sent to the AP and the >> >> name is the same: >> >> >> >> AT+CREG? >> >> >> >> +CREG: 2 (1) >> >> >> >> +CREG: 0,1 (2) >> >> >> >> The (1) is an unsolicited command from BP side but the (2) is the >> >> actual response for the AT+CREG? command, if this case happens, has >> >> gsmd2 processed it correctly? >> > >> > I don't know about gsmd2 offhand, however in general there are two ways >> > to deal with this problem: >> > >> > 1.) Disable sending unsolicited responses between commands. There's a >> > 07.07 command to control that. >> > >> > 2.) Allow sending unsolicited responses at all times (this is better for >> > latency) and dedicate an own GSM channel for unsolicited responses. >> >> How to? If enable this maybe the 07.10(MUX) must be enabled? > > Correct. ophoned uses the Calypso in MUX mode by utilizing gsm0710muxd. > Um, I want to ask you that will MUX the unsolicited response to a dedicated channel make the code less portable? Maybe another modem won't support this feature.
Or this is a mandatory item in the GSM spec? Thanks. Bin _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
