I havent thought out the details, but essentially I would like a system where I could be more attentive To the people making big contributions, without ignoring those who have yet to make one. Tough balance.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Samblas Martinez Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 3:14 PM To: List for Openmoko community discussion Subject: RE: Why not use votation system? good one, code committed to main stream distro? or bash code ? python script included in that offer? --- El dom, 15/6/08, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > De: steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Asunto: RE: Why not use votation system? > Para: "'List for Openmoko community discussion'" > <community@lists.openmoko.org> > Fecha: domingo, 15 junio, 2008 9:18 > Could we weight votes by code committed. No code. No vote. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michele > Renda > Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 1:25 AM > To: List for Openmoko community discussion > Subject: Re: Why not use votation system? > > Hi Steve > > I think I was a bit mis-understood. > > I didn't told that all the decisions must to be took with a votation > system! > If we would do so I think we will not have a phone, but a microwave. > > My idea was only: when Openmoko has to take a decision between two > equivalent solution and WANT to know the opinions of the comunity to > use a votation system. But only for opinion asked by OM, like it was > for the audio jacket. > > And in every case must to be clear that also if the votation say > "choose A" > the final decision must to be tooken by OM, because you must to invest > on it. > > I hope I clarified something :) > > steve wrote: > > The complexity of the decision is deeper than that. > > > > It involves cost, engineering budget, schedule, price, > return on > > investment, parts availability. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Brad > > Midgley > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:12 PM > > To: List for Openmoko community discussion > > Subject: Re: Why not use votation system? > > > > Michele > > > > > >> Do you want feature X or feature Y? > >> > > > > you might need a table representing the cost and > business feasibility > > of each feature. We've seen a lot more > transparency on the 3g decision > > recently which reveals it to be more complicated than > people thought. > > > > -- > > Brad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openmoko community mailing list > > community@lists.openmoko.org > > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openmoko community mailing list > > community@lists.openmoko.org > > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ______________________________________________ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community