I agree, this will motivate package maintainers to upload to opkg.org if they want to be included in that repo.
Risto H. Kurppa wrote: > Renaming packages to .opk wouldn't be too bad but I don't see the > benefit as they all work. > > I agree that there's a problem with outdated packages that move away > from opkg.org. Maybe the best option would be not to show these > packages in the repository any more though it's bad for an user who is > used to install some stuff from opkg.org (using a script, for > example). User gets an error that the package isn't available (is this > better than installing an old package?) so he has to go (to opkg.org) > and try to find where is it now. > > r > _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
