I believe that's a nice idea to converge our efforts in having something really usable/complete soon. IMHO the path "open repo"->improvement of packs->pkg-fso should be efficace. d
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Marcel <tan...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Monday 16 March 2009 16:51:24 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors: > > Marcel <tan...@googlemail.com> writes: > > > (pkg-fso for example). To achieve this the requirements to get into > > > pkg-fso shouldn't be too demanding imho. > > > > I thought pkg-fso was a temporary repository for packages that are > > aiming to enter debian. I would be surprised if I got some low-quality > > stuff from there. > > > > > An open repository like opkg.org but accessible directly from apt > would > > > be ideal. > > > > I'm afraid that'd have very low quality :-( > > Package quality is an issue indeed, but I'd prefer an "open repository" > (does > that term already exist?) over packages spread all over the web even if > quality suffers from that. One could improve packages later on and then > include them into pkg-fso/debian. > If people get to know their future favourite software by finding it on > $repo > and then go and improve the package so that it can be included in debian, > that would be the way I'd go... (Which implies people knowing that $repo > isn't the final place to go.) > > -- > Marcel > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community >
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community