Hi, Ivan, В Втр, 28/12/2010 в 06:04 +0300, Ivan Matveev пишет: > Lets burn some linux.org.ru style flame!
Hey, such foreword spoils good talk, so i'll try to be short. >> It's also possible to setup u-boot like qi, 'read kernel first from sd part 1, boot if loads, then try from sd part 2, boot if loads, then from nand'. All with 10 lines in config file. Just noone need it. > No one needs the good stuff :). Cause is that this stuff is not good :) > Does every FR user have to develop a bootloader? Process of changing configuration is not development. Process of looking up something in C sources of Qi is development ;) > Please tell me how to do this! I have no religious bind to Qi. To hell with minimalism, let us all use the bootloader that is standard, smart, configurable and well supported. I think easiest way is to use fw_setenv. I rethought, need relatively trivial modification to u-boot to support loading plain file to env variable with something like 'ext2loadvar location [var]'. But this brain-dead by design idea require bootloader to support all possible fses (how does qi reads ubifs for kernel parameters, if it has no support for ubi?) > I'm waiting for Radek's comment on this. Qi's sources are not easy, no stdlib functions. Local Qi pontiff is Paul Fertser. > Please do not be offended. I was frustrated by FR suddenly not booting. It's impossible to offend me with good arguments. Gennady. _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
