Maybe I should clarify:
I am not trying to update an older installation of CE. I am creating
a new app using the desert/CE template.
I am past the issue with the desert dependency (I installed desert
manually, although I understand that your updated template resolves
this issue).
In the setup template, right after asking for the url for the
application, I see this:
file config/application.yml
executing script/generate plugin_migration from /home/errol/
rails_apps/test_ce_w2.3.2
Missing these required gems:
rmagick
You're running:
ruby 1.8.7.72 at /usr/bin/ruby1.8
rubygems 1.3.1 at /home/errol/.gem/ruby/1.8, /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
However, I know that I have the rmagick gem installed and working,
because I have another app on the same machine using it (rails 2.2.2
with CE stable branch).
Make sense?
Thanks,
Errol
On Apr 24, 8:19 am, Bruno Bornsztein <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Is your environment.rb file updated? You have to require desert before the
> Rails initializer block (see step 6 of Readme or UPGRADE.markdown)
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:00 PM, eksatx <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the response, but while I am using Ubuntu also, I did not
> > use synaptic to install rmagick. I used synaptic to install ruby,
> > built and installed gem from source, then installed rails and all
> > other gems (including rmagick) with gem. Again, the stable branch of
> > CE is working fine and using rmagick on this machine with rails 2.2.2.
>
> > On Apr 23, 10:54 pm, Tom Bostelmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > i had similar problems when i used synaptic package manager (for ubuntu)
> > to
> > > install rmagic and the mysql gem. if you're using a package manager to
> > > install gems instead of 'gem' itself, this might be part of the problem.
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:51 PM, eksatx <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I also get an error trying to generate the CE migrations. It tells me
> > > > I am missing the rmagick gem, even though I know it is installed and
> > > > working (my existing stable version of CE relies on it).
>
> > > > From the stack trace:
>
> > > > Missing these required gems:
> > > > rmagick
>
> > > > You're running:
> > > > ruby 1.8.7.72 at /usr/bin/ruby1.8
> > > > rubygems 1.3.1 at /home/errol/.gem/ruby/1.8, /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
>
> > > > Run `rake gems:install` to install the missing gems.
>
> > > > However --
>
> > > > gem list
>
> > > > *** LOCAL GEMS ***
>
> > > > actionmailer (2.3.2, 2.2.2)
> > > > actionpack (2.3.2, 2.2.2)
> > > > activerecord (2.3.2, 2.2.2)
> > > > activeresource (2.3.2, 2.2.2)
> > > > activesupport (2.3.2, 2.2.2)
> > > > aws-s3 (0.6.1)
> > > > builder (2.1.2)
> > > > desert (0.5.0)
> > > > haml (2.0.9)
> > > > hpricot (0.8.1)
> > > > htmlentities (4.0.0)
> > > > mime-types (1.16)
> > > > rails (2.3.2, 2.2.2)
> > > > rake (0.8.4)
> > > > RedCloth (4.1.9)
> > > > rmagick (2.9.1)
> > > > sqlite3-ruby (1.2.4)
> > > > xml-simple (1.0.12)
>
> > > > On Apr 23, 3:16 pm, Antoine <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Nice !
>
> > > > > I just updated ! It works fine !
>
> > > > > Congrat !
>
> > > > > Antoine
>
> > > > > On Apr 23, 6:31 pm, Bruno Bornsztein <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Ok, just merged the desert branch into edge (and deleted the desert
> > > > branch).
> > > > > > So the edge branch now runs on Desert and is Rails 2.3 compatible.
> > To
> > > > > > install:
> > > > > > rails your_app_name -mhttp://
> > > >www.communityengine.org/install_template.rb
>
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Bruno
>
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bruno Bornsztein <
>
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Update: installing CE (the Desert version) is getting even
> > easier:
> > > > > > > rails your_app_name -m
>
> > > >http://github.com/bborn/communityengine/raw/desert/community_engine_s.
> > ..
>
> > > > > > > (If you're willing to try out the Desert version of CE)
> > > > > > > This will build a complete Rails app with CE installed in one
> > click.
> > > > After
> > > > > > > it completes, all you have to do is start your server!
>
> > > > > > > Let me know if you try it out and have any feedback.
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Bruno
>
> > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Bruno Bornsztein <
> > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> Update: I have a CE branch going that uses Desert instead of
> > > > Engines:
> > > > > > >>http://github.com/bborn/communityengine/tree/desert
>
> > > > > > >> I'll playing with this for a couple of days in my apps to see
> > how
> > > > well it
> > > > > > >> integrates, and wether I want to move in that direction. As
> > always,
> > > > feedback
> > > > > > >> is appreciated.
>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> Bruno
>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Bruno Bornsztein <
> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >>> Update; after doing some more investigating, looks like some of
> > the
> > > > > > >>> Engines features I really like (namely, code mixing) break in
> > 2.3.
> > > > For
> > > > > > >>> example, even with the latest Engines plugin installed, helpers
> > > > aren't being
> > > > > > >>> mixed correctly. I'm going to spend a little more time thinking
> > > > about how to
> > > > > > >>> proceed (and evaluating whether CE should switch to using the
> > > > Desert
> > > > > > >>> plugin).
> > > > > > >>> I'm open to feedback or suggestions; but it's a little hard to
> > know
> > > > > > >>> exactly where Rails will go (will they support all of Engines
> > > > features or
> > > > > > >>> not), and where Engines will go (will it be updated to maintain
> > > > > > >>> compatibility with 2.3)?
>
> > > > > > >>> For now, I'd advise against upgrading CE apps to 2.3, until we
> > get
> > > > this
> > > > > > >>> figured out.
>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>> Bruno
>
> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Bruno Bornsztein <
> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >>>> Edge is where the development happens, but I hadn't done any
> > 2.3
> > > > > > >>>> compatibility stuff there yet. I'm keeping the Rails 2.3 stuff
> > in
> > > > its own
> > > > > > >>>> branch (rails_2.3) to allow people to test it out before
> > merging
> > > > it into
> > > > > > >>>> edge.
>
> > > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Tom Bostelmann <
> > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > >>>>> I'm a little confused. I thought the 'edge' branch was where
> > you
> > > > were
> > > > > > >>>>> working on rails 2.3 changes. In fact, I'm using the 'edge'
> > > > branch with my
> > > > > > >>>>> project as we speak - the big caveat being that I'm using
> > only a
> > > > subset of
> > > > > > >>>>> the functionality.
>
> > > > > > >>>>> In any case, sorry for posting my confusion - but is there
> > any
> > > > > > >>>>> documentation that explains what each branch is for?
>
> > > > > > >>>>> Tom
>
> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Bruno Bornsztein <
> > > > > > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Hey all,Finally had a moment this afternoon to start on
> > Rails
> > > > 2.3
> > > > > > >>>>>> compatibility for CE, and it was easier than I expected:
>
> > > > > > >>>>>>http://github.com/bborn/communityengine/tree/rails_2.3
>
> > > > > > >>>>>> (Note: you'll need the latest Engines plugin)
>
> > > > > > >>>>>> All tests are passing, but I'm not using it on production
> > yet,
> > > > so I'd
> > > > > > >>>>>> appreciate feedback from people. Once I get my apps
> > upgraded,
> > > > I'll merge
> > > > > > >>>>>> this into edge. The next point release of CE will be 2.3
> > > > compatible.
>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>>> Bruno
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CommunityEngine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
