comp-protocols-dns-bind  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Vincent Poy
  • RE: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Vinny Abello
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Danny Mayer
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Danny Mayer
  • RE: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Vinny Abello
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding midintertech
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Jeremy C. Reed
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Vincent Poy
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Mark Andrews
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Dan Mahoney, System Admin
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Mark Andrews
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Vincent Poy
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Thomas Schulz
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Darren Grayson
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Mark Andrews
  • RE: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Vinny Abello
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Darren Grayson
  • RE: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Ian Tait
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Danny Mayer
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Evan Hunt
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding Danny Mayer
• [SPAM] Connection time out Christian
  • Re: [SPAM] Connection time out Kevin Darcy
• Why so different versions for Bind9 exist? iman
  • Re: Why so different versions for Bind9 exist? Mark Andrews
• Re: Cant get bind 9.5.0-P2 to compile under cc or gcc Thomas Schulz
  • Re: Cant get bind 9.5.0-P2 to compile under cc or gcc Kevin Darcy
  • Re: Cant get bind 9.5.0-P2 to compile under cc or gcc Bruce Esquibel
• Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box MaryJane
  • RE: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box Jeff Lightner
  • RE: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box John Horne
  • Re: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box Mark Andrews
  • Re: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box Sam Wilson
  • RE: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box Jeff Lightner
  • Re: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box Joe Makowiec
  • Re: Determining version of BIND running on RHEL 4.0 box Sam Wilson
• Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain caio
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Kevin Darcy
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain caio
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Chris Buxton
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain caio
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Chris Buxton
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain caio
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Chris Buxton
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain caio
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Chris Buxton
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Barry Margolin
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Chris Buxton
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain caio
  • Re: Bind 9.4.2 not resolving one domain Chris Buxton
• Bind9.5.1b1 Heavy CPU Load? iman
  • Re: Bind9.5.1b1 Heavy CPU Load? Fr34k
• Re: Should I register namehost or not? Barry Margolin
• Re: how to configure bind in LAN Barry Margolin
• Re: servfail's with 951b1 sgopi
  • Re: servfail's with 951b1 Kevin Darcy
• Re: Any need for nscd? Gary Mills
• Bind 9.2.1 (redhat) and windows 2003 zone transfer JPancrazio
  • Re: Bind 9.2.1 (redhat) and windows 2003 zone transfer Chris Buxton
• Bad delegation? doumakes
  • Re: Bad delegation? Mark Andrews
• BIND 9.3.5-P1 update corrupted no longer in chroot Larry Gross
• Re: direct queries of reverse zone, [not] using CNAME hack Barry Margolin
• Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks Barry Margolin
• how to overcome underscore in A record PM Wong
  • Re: how to overcome underscore in A record Kevin Darcy
  • Re: how to overcome underscore in A record Ben Croswell
  • Re: how to overcome underscore in A record Mark Andrews
  • Re: how to overcome underscore in A record Mark Andrews
  • Re: how to overcome underscore in A record Barry Margolin
• Can internal root server also forward? joeunc
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? Kevin Darcy
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? Ben Croswell
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? Mark Andrews
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? Barry Margolin
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? joeunc
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? John Hascall
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? Kevin Darcy
  • Re: Can internal root server also forward? Michael Milligan
• bind 9.5.1b1(rndc.key) Problem iman
  • Re: bind 9.5.1b1(rndc.key) Problem Matthew Pounsett
  • Re: bind 9.5.1b1(rndc.key) Problem Mark Andrews
• LISA '08 Registration Now Available Lionel Garth Jones
• Bind9.5.1b1 (root.zone&Logging) problem iman
  • Re: Bind9.5.1b1 (root.zone&Logging) problem Mark Andrews
• Bind9.5.1b1 problem in answering remote queries? iman
  • Re: Bind9.5.1b1 problem in answering remote queries? Wael Shahin
  • Re: Bind9.5.1b1 problem in answering remote queries? Mark Andrews
• Bind9.5.1b1 missing from&extra records in (hints) iman
  • Re: Bind9.5.1b1 missing from&extra records in (hints) Barry Margolin
• Standard response for failed lookups Linux Dude
• BIND's Implementation of Zones/"Subzones" Eric
  • Re: BIND's Implementation of Zones/"Subzones" Mark Andrews
  • Re: BIND's Implementation of Zones/"Subzones" Eric
  • Re: BIND's Implementation of Zones/"Subzones" Kevin Darcy
  • Re: BIND's Implementation of Zones/"Subzones" Mark Andrews
  • Re: BIND's Implementation of Zones/"Subzones" Barry Margolin
• ISC Bind 9.5.0 P2 and error on Windows 2003 JESUS
  • Re: ISC Bind 9.5.0 P2 and error on Windows 2003 Danny Mayer
  • Re: ISC Bind 9.5.0 P2 and error on Windows 2003 JESUS
• Re: bind 9.3.5-P2 init.d script Zeffie
• CNAME hack??? Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
  • Re: CNAME hack??? jmc
  • Re: CNAME hack??? Mark Andrews
  • Re: CNAME hack??? Chris Thompson
  • Re: CNAME hack??? Barry Margolin
• setting up reverse DNS to dozens of /24 networks Hal Jackson
  • RE: setting up reverse DNS to dozens of /24 networks Kitchens, Douglas
  • Re: setting up reverse DNS to dozens of /24 networks Mark Andrews
• Re: Zone Xfer Question Barry Margolin
• Re: Ready to get feet wet with IPv6 - pointers/How-Tos? D. Stussy
• Re: 9.5.0-P2 and socket: too many open file descriptors Sam Wilson
  • Re: 9.5.0-P2 and socket: too many open file descriptors Mark Andrews
• dfad sanbat
  • Re: dfad Kevin Darcy
  • Re: dfad Mark Andrews
• DNSSEC in Windows / BIND DNS Environment Phillip
  • Re: DNSSEC in Windows / BIND DNS Environment Danny Mayer
  • Re: DNSSEC in Windows / BIND DNS Environment Danny Mayer
• DNS - multiple question with a single query jota
  • Re: DNS - multiple question with a single query bert hubert
  • Re: DNS - multiple question with a single query Julio Olivares
• problem with setting BIND instance as a name-server for domain ivanhoe
• Recursive queries fail if query source port is not fixed Hans Fredrik Nordhaug
• Re: BIND 9.3.5-P1 random UDP src ports: some DNS responses delivered to wrong process Irwin Tillman
• resolve hostname outside my domain orak
  • Re: resolve hostname outside my domain orak
• Re: How to patch Fedora Core 2 Bind RPM? jri
  • Re: How to patch Fedora Core 2 Bind RPM? Adam Tkac
  • RE: How to patch Fedora Core 2 Bind RPM? Jeff Lightner
• Re: Regarding Parallel Support Barry Margolin
• Re: testing vulnerability against secondary NS Barry Margolin
• Re: Is it possible to force BIND to use TCP exclusively? Barry Margolin
• BIND 9.4.2 P2 and Port range Specification smorzando07
  • Re: BIND 9.4.2 P2 and Port range Specification JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• BIND: unknown option 'ACL' tiutiun
• selecttest on Solaris 9 Gary Mills
• Re: ISC BIND 9.3.5-P2 is now available Gary Mills
  • Re: ISC BIND 9.3.5-P2 is now available JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Bind 9.5.0-P2 : views and DynDNS mathieu . oudart
  • Re: Bind 9.5.0-P2 : views and DynDNS Kevin Darcy
• BIND als backup DNS server for WXP clients John
• Re: rbtdb assertion and segfault Kai Lanz
• Re: BIND 9.5.0-P1 exiting due to assertion failure in rbtdb.c Chris Adams
• Re: BIND 9.4.3b2 crashes bruce . hayward
• Re: Issues with BIND 9.5.0-P2 cherrera156
• UPDATE on 9.5.0-P2 Terpasaur
  • Re: UPDATE on 9.5.0-P2 Mark Andrews
  • Re: UPDATE on 9.5.0-P2 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
  • Re: UPDATE on 9.5.0-P2 Mark Andrews
• Re: BIND 9 - force secondary to update/refresh from primary netcat
• Re: Query timeouts on FreeBSD 7 over network netcat
  • Re: Query timeouts on FreeBSD 7 over network Igor V. Ruzanov
  • Re: Query timeouts on FreeBSD 7 over network Andy Kosela
• Re: FW: Critical: .\socket.c:640: REQUIRE(sock->hEvent != ((void *)0)) failed, general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) Danny Mayer
  • RE: FW: Critical: .\socket.c:640: REQUIRE(sock->hEvent != ((void *)0)) failed, general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) Tim Rutherford
• Recursive queries through authoritative server John Oliver
  • Re: Recursive queries through authoritative server Barry Margolin
• Any Thoughts on using a Windows DNS server for Public facing versus a DNS Appliance? sekoon06
  • RE: Any Thoughts on using a Windows DNS server for Public facing versus a DNS Appliance? Jeff Lightner
• Assertion debug information David Ford
  • Re: Assertion debug information JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Re: NODATA type 3 with CNAME Barry Margolin
• Re: ACL for Forwarders Dawn Connelly
  • Re: ACL for Forwarders Linux Addict
• Flush cache only for one domain ram
  • Re: Flush cache only for one domain Ben Croswell
• Re: Risks of patched servers behind de-randomizing NAT Jarosław Rafa
  • Re: Risks of patched servers behind de-randomizing NAT David Carmean
  • Re: Risks of patched servers behind de-randomizing NAT Evan Hunt
  • Re: Risks of patched servers behind de-randomizing NAT Mark Andrews
• Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases George R. Kasica
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases Mark Andrews
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases Jukka Pakkanen
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases Ben Croswell
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases Sten Carlsen
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases Mark Andrews
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases David Ford
  • Re: ISC statement about BIND9's recent -P1 releases Danny Mayer
• bind9.4.3b2 on solaris 10&solaris 9 crash caowh
  • Re: bind9.4.3b2 on solaris 10&solaris 9 crash JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • ACL for Forwarders Linux Addict
  • Re: ACL for Forwarders Jeremy C. Reed
  • Re: ACL for Forwarders Barry Margolin
• domain twice Aron Bhand
  • Re: domain twice Dawn Connelly
  • Re: domain twice Gregory Hicks
• Re: Configuration with faked root wildcards and forward zones Barry Margolin
• Re: Preventing recursion ... (preventing confusion?) Barry Margolin
  • RE: Preventing recursion ... (preventing confusion?) Jeff Lightner
  • Re: Preventing recursion ... (preventing confusion?) Barry Margolin
• Re: Upgrade from 9.3.1 to 9.3.5p1 Bruce Esquibel
• DNS Exploit Attempts?? Terpasaur
  • Re: DNS Exploit Attempts?? Dawn Connelly
  • Re: DNS Exploit Attempts?? Emery Rudolph
  • RE: DNS Exploit Attempts?? Jeff Lightner
  • Re: DNS Exploit Attempts?? Bruce Esquibel
  • Re: DNS Exploit Attempts?? Paul Vixie
• Re: Why dns lookup is possible without root hint file? D. Stussy
• Post-build test fail on BIND 9, old system Jarosław Rafa

• Earlier messages
• Later messages