>Exactly. I think William has pointed out the key factor:
>something may be technically feasible, but how usable is it?
[...]
>Right now the Classic gets on the (text-only) Internet just
>fine with a dial-up modem, ZTerm and an A/UX shell account;
>and it also accesses TCP/IP e-mail with  MacTCP, MacPPP, and
>an early version of Eudora [...]
>Does anyone have any experience with exactly this set-up
>that counters that?

Well, yes. Although I use a IIci for regular mail & browse, my 3 Classics
all are set up with PPP/MacTCP, so I can hook them up to a modem anytime I
want to. Mailing is good, FTP is fine, but for browsing, the only thing I
have been able to put to use was MacWWW. Which was hilariuos, but actually
rather horrible. (it was my first time getting a Mac onlineI thought I'd do
it in style. I surfed LEM & crashed at the link to the FAQ, haha! ) I
remmber trying MacWeb, but couldn't get it to work om a Classic. It's
lacking the right QuickDraw in it's ROM, IIRC.

Does anybody know what the status is of the attempts to get the source-code
of one of the early browsers to change it to somthing useful for 68000
machines? and/or who might be the one(s) to ask/contact?

¬mart



--
Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>.

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to