On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 05:19 AM, Dave Lee wrote: > I was thinking this at first, and began to copy all of them. But it > is a pretty big > task. And a lot of this software needs a 128k or 512k to run, it > won't run on a > Plus. I am wondering the value of these still. >
IMHO such s/w is of particular interest simply because it shows the skill of the programmers in getting so much functionality into so little RAM. FWIW if I ever had to truncate my Mac collection, I'd keep the 128K, 512K , 512Ke and the Plus in preference to anything else, since they are _the_ original incarnation of the whole Mac concept and everything later is derivative. Stuart -- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>. Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
