I know I won't see a big performance gain with a maxed out 132 MB Color Classic vs. a more typical 36 MB running OS 8.1, but, or course, we don't upgrade these for practical purposes, do we? Also, people seem to have more problems with the larger sizes.
Greg
PS. Yes, I know 128MB would be faster for running multiple applications and Photoshop than 36MB, but that's not going to be a typical use for this machine.
-- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>.
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:" Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Think Different Store
http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
