On Tuesday, September 13, 2005, at 11:36PM, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If one has the choice, which ROM (IIfx or IIsi) is more suitable for >the transplant (from actual experience)? > >From what I have gathered from searching the list archives and >checking out Gamba's site, is that either ROM will work, but I don't >have a sense of which is more compatible. I read somewhere that >someone had problems with the floppy drive when they used a IIfx ROM. > >Besides providing 32 bit clean code, what are the operational >differences with using the different ROM? > >Thanks! >Thomas Someone with more knowledge may correct me, but the IIfx has a seperate co-processor for almost everything and they were non-standard. Each FDD the machine is capable of using has its own co-processor. Maybe the ROM is hardwired to understand these and using it in a "normal" machine makes odd things happen. Take care. -- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>. Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
