On Jun 26, 06 20:21:15 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > >> > If I were you, I'd just branch "officially" and compete. > MH> I would suggest to try hard to *not* do that. Branching has always > MH> been the source for problems. > > Tell that Emacs/XEmacs, egcs/gcc or XFree86/X.org X11. :-)
Yes, and all of them have been a PITA, especially emacs/xemacs, because both are used. The egcs split turned out irrelevant. The X.org split turned out good, but only because almost all developers switched side. > MH> If he were chating as much as others (including me) do, compiz > MH> wouldn't be where it is now. > > I'm not talking about chatting. I'm talking about meaningful > communication. You know the questions I asked (thanks for your mail, > btw, it was very helpful). Even a link or cut & paste would have been > enough. I was refering to general communication as 'chatting', i.e. using other languages than C. :P Matthias -- Matthias Hopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ __ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ labs www.mshopf.de _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
