On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 02:04 -0400, Quinn Storm wrote: > I've wanted to avoid an "official fork" as long as possible, feeling > that it could in the end work against everyone's best interest, but > this all depends on the upstream (freedesktop.org/novell) developers. > I realize their goals probably differ somewhat from mine / those of us > who work through compiz.net, which has lead to the divergence. If it > comes down to it though, in the spirit of the GPL, I am not against > managing my tree as a semi-fork (I'd still sync with updates from > freedesktop cvs of course, as davidr and friends often commit important > updates) Also, I want to point out, another potential issue with the > current freedesktop codebase is that (and this is NOT something I know > for sure) the novell team MIGHT want to keep it dual-licensed, and not > everyone wants to submit to something under those terms. (I myself am a > GPL gal, but am somewhat flexible if it is necessary)
compiz is not dual-licensed. The core of compiz and the plugins are MIT licensed. The gnome-window-settings module and gnome-window-decorator are GPL licensed. -David _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
