On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 19:29 +0530, Jigish Gohil wrote: > On 10/5/06, Mike Dransfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jigish Gohil wrote: > > > On 10/5/06, Mike Dransfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I would like to keep any patches on a third party site and preferably > > held in git (I personally use svn too but from what I understand git > > makes merging with other git trees easier). I would love to have the > > help of the individual plugin developers which would make life easier > > for everyone, Erkin has been very helpful. > > > > Maybe some sort of plugin developers amnesty would be good. eg. "I > > changed the compiz core for my plugin because....", they will not be > > judged or punished and David will help to get their requirements into > > core without unnecessary patches. :) > > Wouldn't it be more useful to keep the development and porting of > beryl plugins to compiz on beryl server, as that is the place most > developers have accounts and can commit changes at the same time they > commit to beryl.
This, I feel, is a very good idea. That way, the code can stay clean (and it certainly feels so, having recently switched from Beryl to Compiz), but we could still have a beryl-compiz-plugins (say) pacakge, that we can configure in gconf for use with Compiz. On a side note, I'd like to add that I too prefer gnome-compiz-manager and gconf to beryl-settings; and gtk-window-decorator with Metacity theme support to emerald. At least for the moment, that is! _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
