On 10/6/06, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mirco Müller wrote:
> Another thing, which might be regarded as superfluous (as it serves no
> real technical purpose), but worth considering. Give compiz a genuine
> logo to identify it with. The beryl-project is doing the right thing in
> that area (using gem-stones for its various parts). They try to define a
> "brand" or general distincive logo/symbol to identify it with. compiz is
> an empty void in space in that regard, thus unattractive as a project on
> first sight. I assume this is needed to make compiz as is "attractive"
> to gather a community around it.
Before beryl became beryl quite a few people had done compiz logo's (the
red cube with three graphics on it).
I did one of these. See
http://mailforwho.googlepages.com/Compiz_Logo.svg
and
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5525/1331/1600/Compiz%20Logos2.1.jpg
_______________________________________________
compiz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
