Please distribute to others who may be interested...

You are hereby invited to a seminar in our twelfth interdisciplinary series
on Evolution, Complexity and Cognition <http://ecco.vub.ac.be/?q=node/108>
(ECCO 2017-2018)
<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marjoriikka_Ylisiurua>

Time: Friday October 19, 14h-16h

Place: *room * *CLEA*, Krijgskundestraat 33, 1160 Brussels VUB


------------------------------
Cosmology Episodes: Social System Dynamics between Crisis and ResilienceTjorven
Harmsen, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space
Abstract:

It is impossible to ever steady the dynamics of structures – this might be
their most universal feature (cf. Oevermann 2016: 93). Still, the observer
is bound to reducing complexity, to drawing distinctions, to breaking up
paradoxes: until a myth of steadiness emerges (ibid.). As the observer’s
*cosmology* (Weick 1993), this myth provides a set of explanations, of
identifications, names, calls, all directed at ordering ‘world’. At times
however, the set can get severely disrupted, and the observer falls back
again to the origin of its constructed nature: the seemingly paradoxical
simultaneity of the moment.

This disruptive process surfaces as *crisis* within social systems (Luhmann
1996). It becomes manifest in a phase of sense-losing, which triggers a
search for new sense for the system to regain connectivity. Both
sense-losing and subsequent sense-remaking can jointly be referred to as*
cosmology episode *(Weick 1993, Orton & O’Grady 2016). The presentation
aims at introducing such process by reconstructing the empirical case of
the ‘Pallas’ average in the German Wadden Sea, 1998. The case is used to
illustrate how the activation of social *resilience* and the emergence of a
new social structure, both defining the phase of sense-remaking, are driven
by the situational dynamics released in the course of crisis. Particularly
in cases of environmental crisis – as is the ‘Pallas’ average – the process
outcome might need to be assessed not only by socio-internal, but
contextual criteria. The presentation seeks to stimulate discussion about
if and how such criteria for an ‘environmentally adequate’ social
resilience can be found and utilized.


*Works Cited:*


Luhmann, N. (1996): *Social Systems*, Stanford: Stanford University Press


Oevermann, U. (2016): ‚*Krise und Routine’ als sozialwissenschaftliches
Paradigma *[*‘Crisis and Routine‘ as Socio-Scientific Paradigm *– TH],
in: Becker-Lenz, R. / Franzmann, A. / Jansen, A. / Jung, M. (Eds.): *Die
Methodenschule der Objektiven Hermeneutik*, Wiesbaden: Springer, 43-114


O’Grady, Kari A. / Orton, J. D. (2016): *Cosmology Episodes: A
Reconceptualization*, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 13:3,
226-245


Weick, K. E.  (1993): *The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The
Mann Gulch disaster*, Administrative Science Quarterly, Dec 1993, 38, 4,
628-652

-- 
Cadell

ECCO Group (VUB) <http://ecco.vub.ac.be/?q=node/1>
Email:  [email protected]
Website: https://cadelllast.com

Reply via email to