On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Alexandru Stanoi wrote:

> Alexandru Stanoi wrote:
> 
> > Is this something we want or is this something we want? Awaiting 
> > votes and maybe we can use this in some other components tests soon.
> 
> Since nobody voted, but Sebastian said on IRC that he is OK with this 
> patch, then I will add it soon to UnitTest. I think the methods could 
> use some better names, like:
> 
> assertPropertyInvalid()
> assertPropertyMissing()
> assertPropertyFileMissing()
> assertPropertyFileUnreadable()
> assertPropertyDirMissing()
> assertPropertyDirUnreadable()
> assertPropertyDirUnwritable()

I prefer the full name "Directory" though.

regards,
Derick
-- 
Components mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Reply via email to