Alexandru Stanoi wrote: > Hi list, > Is this something we want or is this something we want? Awaiting some > votes and maybe we can use this in some other components tests soon.
Since nobody voted, but Sebastian said on IRC that he is OK with this patch, then I will add it soon to UnitTest. I think the methods could use some better names, like: assertPropertyInvalid() assertPropertyMissing() assertPropertyFileMissing() assertPropertyFileUnreadable() assertPropertyDirMissing() assertPropertyDirUnreadable() assertPropertyDirUnwritable() to keep in line with the other assert methods. Cheers, Alex. -- Alexandru Stanoi eZ Components System Developer eZ Systems | http://ez.no -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
