On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Alexandru Stanoi wrote:

> Kore Nordmann wrote:
> > 
> >> 1. Which regexp to use for email validation?
> >>
> >> a. 
> >> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/HTML_QuickForm/QuickForm/Rule/Email.php?revision=1.4&view=markup
> >> b. http://iamcal.com/publish/articles/php/parsing_email/
> >> c. http://code.iamcal.com/php/rfc822/full_regexp.txt
> >> d. http://ex-parrot.com/~pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.html
> >> e. http://www.tienhuis.nl/files/email_verify_source.php
> >> f. This one (please specify): _________________
> >> g. Write our own one
> > 
> > h) ... no opinion ;)
> 
> > I skip the first one, no matter what you say. ;) ... I can not properly
> > evaluate the regular expressions right now to give a definite answer.
> 
> Would it be sensible to allow the developer to specify his own regular 
> expression for validation?

Why would we want to do that? If a user wants to use a different regexp 
he can just write his own validate function.

> 3. b (1+1), a (1+1) - the punycode functions can be included in all the 
> components that need them, we don't necessarily need to put them in only 
> one place. So it could be in Mail AND Url (and in other places). Bad 
> practice, but easier to think about and it excludes dependencies.

Yeah, but the punycode implementation is not trivial, and replicating 
non-trivial code is something I'd hate to see happening. 

Derick
-- 
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Reply via email to