On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Raymond Bosman wrote: > > > I feel option 3 to be the cleanest, any opinions? If not I'd like to > > implement this ASAP - either today or tomorrow. > > I agree, option 3 is the cleanest. I think that the Base and File component > do > not have to be updated in one go. The class names are different.
Not really true. If we make the ezcFile class extend ezcBaseFile and the users only update the File component, and not Base, their code will be broken as the class that is extended does not exist yet. regards, Derick -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
