On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > After summarizing my views, the questions now are: > > 1. Do we need to support composite IDs?
We don't *need* anything, and I think I agree that this might be something that adds a lot of complexity to PersistentObject. Perhaps we should not do this then. > 2. Do we want to support composite properties? If it does not add too much complexity, I think we should see if we can come up with a decently easy design for doing so. But if there is no elegant way, we should abandon this too. regards, Derick -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
