> > No, I don't think we can find a way here, either. We would still need to > > introduce a new definition class to be used alternatively to > > ezcPersistentObjectProperty (the current defintion class for > > properties). This would mean checks anywhere such a property is used in > > a query, which applies to as many places as it does for the ID property. > > A better way is to create a whole new definition class that supports both the current and the new id's and to have our code support only that. In the definition loader we detect if there are old style definitions which we simply convert to new style definitions. This way we don't make the code more complicated than necessary.
> > Therefore I'd suggest to close #8963 as "Won't implement". Although I think this issue is hard and complicated I think we should support it eventually since not having this functionality can be a showstopper for anyone with legacy databases. Cheers, Frederik -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
