On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 11:49 +0000, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Alexandru Stanoi wrote:
> 
> > Kore Nordmann wrote:
> > > 
> > > Find the PDF generation requirements document for the document component
> > > attached.
> > > 
> > > This document offers a first discussion base for a requirements
> > > specification of PDF generation, which is on the roadmap for this
> > > release cycle. It does not involve reading PDF (which would mean
> > > converting PDF to Docbook).
> > > 
> > > The design and implementation of the PDF generation will be discussed
> > > once we agreed on the requirements.
> > 
> >  From the requirements and the discussion I see it is a complicated 
> > thing to do docbook to PDF conversion. And I think it will be similar 
> > with docbook to ODF.
> > 
> > My question is why not do the ODF support first, then use existing tools 
> > to convert ODF to PDF? This way you don't have to do the same (hard) 
> > work twice.
> 
> One of the reasons is that the external tools incur a great amount of 
> dependencies. 

There are docbook to ODF xsl templates that do not really require any
additional stuff except zip'ing the stuff.


CYA Arne

-- 
Those who do not understand Unix 
      are condemned to reinvent it, poorly (Henry Spencer)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Reply via email to