Maybe we could agree that 1 day out of 7 in a week would be played on 6 times faster time controls. The same bots, connections, logins, the same number of games per week. Different rating of course. This would be a problem only for hardcoded bots with no time control.
The advantage would be that we would see how different algorithms (bots) scale. If the ratings would be very similar for most bots, it would mean that we can get faster testing of new ideas. We would know which ideas can be tested of fast time control. Lukasz 2009/6/16 Don Dailey <[email protected]>: > >From what I can see, there is resistance to this idea - so what I'm going > to do is to provide venues which are standalone but makes it possible later > to add a time control. In other words for now there will be only 1 time > control per board size but the server will be flexible enough that other > venues can be added if the server ever gets popular enough that we have 40 > or 50 players always on line. But they will be separate venues scheduled > independently. > > > - Don > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Isaac Deutsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm voting for 2 time settings: One normal and one fast (so maybe 5 min >> and 1 min on 9x9). >> -- >> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! >> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
