Separate rating pools are a given.   I will not rate 2 separate time
controls as if they are the same, even though that is done in human games.

- Don


On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Michael Williams <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I vote for 2 venues, each optional.  Separate rating pools is a must.
>
>
>
> Łukasz Lew wrote:
>
>> Maybe we could agree that 1 day out of 7 in a week would be played on
>> 6 times faster time controls.
>> The same bots, connections, logins, the same number of games per week.
>> Different rating of course.
>> This would be a problem only for hardcoded bots with no time control.
>>
>> The advantage would be that we would see how different algorithms (bots)
>> scale.
>> If the ratings would be very similar for most bots, it would mean that
>> we can get faster testing of new ideas.
>> We would know which ideas can be tested of fast time control.
>>
>> Lukasz
>>
>> 2009/6/16 Don Dailey <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> >From what I can see, there is resistance to this idea - so what I'm
>>> going
>>> to do is to provide venues which are standalone but makes it possible
>>> later
>>> to add a time control.    In other words for now there will be only 1
>>> time
>>> control per board size but the server will be flexible enough that other
>>> venues can be added if the server ever gets popular enough that we have
>>> 40
>>> or 50 players always on line.   But they will be separate venues
>>> scheduled
>>> independently.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Don
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Isaac Deutsch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm voting for 2 time settings: One normal and one fast (so maybe 5 min
>>>> and 1 min on 9x9).
>>>> --
>>>> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
>>>> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> computer-go mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> computer-go mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>> computer-go mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to