On 1/14/07, Nick Apperson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Nick Apperson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ... Essentially says that the maximum amount of information is proportional to the 2D surface around it. Even if we live in a many-dimensional world (I happen to believe we do), the area surrounding it would still be 2 dimensional as long as these are small dimensions.
I don't understand why that boundary would necessarily be 2 dimensional. Isn't the boundary of an N dimensional hypervolume simply an N-1 dimensional hypersurface? E. _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
