On Saturday 03 March 2007, Stuart A. Yeates wrote: > In an ideal world I'd love to see go move to RFC 3920, but that would > be quite a disruptive shift.
this RFC describes an asynchronous message passing system; GTP is more like a simple remote procedure call at Go engines. These are different things and therefore you cannot really compare GTP to UCI or call UCI more advanced. I cringe, when I think about how to write tools that need to access functionality of Go engines, but have to deal with unexpected messages or state changes at any time. - Markus _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
