On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 19:20 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The way the cross-tables are sorted in the new CGOS, by strength, > seems much nicer to me. I hope it stays this way. And 5 minute games > sounds like a good compromise. I'm enjoying the 2 minute (really 3 > minute, I guess) games. > > My only complaint about the 1 second leeway is that it makes it look > as if my program is taking 100 times longer than most of its > opponents. It makes getting creamed by Mogo just all that much more > galling. ;)
I think I'm going to change the leeway to a much more modest 1/4 second. A number of opponent are playing for free. - Don > Dave Hillis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Sent: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 6:41 PM > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Help me test CGOS > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Don Dailey wrote: > > I have a prototype of the new CGOS server up and running. > > How about sorting the cross-tables by opponent name (please > don't distinguish upper/lower-case). > > Christoph > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and > industry-leading spam and email virus protection. > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
