On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 23:41 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote: > My guess is that the answer which type of search works best for a > given evaluation function depends on the amounts of (deterministic) > bias and (probabilistic) uncertainty in the evaluations (and so far I > see MC mainly as an extremely noisy evaluation with not too much > systematic bias).
It's interesting that Sylvain seems to consider the stronger Mogo versions more brittle in some sense. He claimed (in so many words) that Lazarus gets results more consistent with it's ratings and that the strongest Mogo's do not. I wonder if this is because the play-outs are now more systematically biased? - Don _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
