I don't have a copy of the code, but the bias of any given node should be the sum of the bias of all of its children.
On Jan 9, 2008 1:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking at the code of Libgo110. I have a question. In the file > uct.cpp and the definition of class note_t, the explore_coeff is > calculated from log(node->bias). But in the paper 'Modification of UCT with > Patterns in Monte-Carlo Go' table 1 line 10 -17, the explore_coeff is > calculated from log(nb), where nb is the summation of node->bias for all the > child nodes. Whyis the difference? Or did I read the code wrong? > > Thanks for any explanation. > > DL > ------------------------------ > More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL > Mail<http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003> > ! > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
