Thanks, now they are equivalent. Is it that the lines 10 - 13 in the Table 1 of the paper can be replaced by nb := node.nb?
DL -----Original Message----- From: Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: computer-go <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 1:17 pm Subject: Re: [computer-go] On question about Libego110 I don't have a copy of the code, but the bias of any given node should be the sum of the bias of all of its children. On Jan 9, 2008 1:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I'm looking at the code of Libgo110. I have a question. In the file uct.cpp and the definition of class note_t, the explore_coeff is calculated from log(node->bias). But in the paper 'Modification of UCT with Patterns in Monte-Carlo Go' table 1 line 10 -17, the explore_coeff is calculated from log(nb), where nb is the summation of node->bias for all the child nodes. Whyis the difference? Or did I read the code wrong? Thanks for any explanation. DL More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail! _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
