On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:11 AM, Don Dailey wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Don Dailey wrote:
However, I don't remember if I calibrated the graph or whether it's
arbitrary. It seems like I had a version of gnugo as an
anchor, but I
don't see it in the graph. I could have simply extrapolated
from CGOS
for one of the version.
I remember the graph beeing uncalibrated.
For the purpose of this study it doesn't matter whether you
calibrate
the ratings or not. They are all relative and they are linear (to
calibrate, just add or subtract a constant from each rating.) The
study was designed to show the value of a doubling. The study shows
that with 11 doublings you gain approximately 1700 ELO points.
I agree.
Christoph
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
