Michael Williams wrote: > It seems like our CPU cyces would be better used testing even higher > levels of MoGo than the current levels of Fatman. MoGo appears to be > at least an order of magnitude more efficient. The same thought occurred to me too. I want to see if Mogo keeps going.
But this experiment is going very well with all the help we are getting - I'm not ready to stop yet. Let's give it a few more days and see how long the programs keep climbing. 50 games is not a satisfying statical sample. When this test is completed, let's use the infrastructure I created here to run a self-play mogo test by pushing mogo to higher levels. I can keep the mogo vs mogo data intact from this study and transfer it to the next (it's in a database and so this is easy.) - Don > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
