I will just let the tests run and we can interpret the results later. I believe Mogo has some code to reuse nodes in the tree - although it may not be quite as efficient.
Olivier seemed to think it would work acceptably well. - Don Michael Williams wrote: > Also, with the parameters you are using for MoGo, I think the tree > will stop growing at 100k nodes, which doesn't take very long to get to. > > > Don Dailey wrote: >> I wish I had named the weakest players _00 instead of _01 and expressed >> everything as you are suggesting, it would indeed be clearer. >> I could actually fix this by reprogramming the scripts without changing >> the running programs. If I get a burst of energy perhaps ... >> >> The tarball is slightly interesting. I have it so that you untar into >> a directory, run a script and there is nothing left to have to do - >> every hour a summary of the results so far is ftp'd to my computer. >> This is so others can help me with the study. You can stop or restart >> the script at any time. >> So far, I am running two instances and I am running another instance on >> a friends computer remotely. >> Here is a simple riddle which I had to solve but made me think for a >> moment: >> >> It involves how to keep track of various versions of the result files >> which each user would send me every hour. Do you put a version number >> on it? How do you track which file belongs to which user and which is >> the latest version without mixing things up and duplicating data? >> My first reaction was to somehow label or stamp each file, perhaps with >> the hostname or something and a version number. But none of this is >> necessary. >> - Don >> >> >> >> >> >> Jeff Nowakowski wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 20:31 -0500, Don Dailey wrote: >>> >>>> Although it's not on the graph itself, Gnugo-3.7.11 level 10 is >>>> set to >>>> be 1800.0 ELO. >>>> >>> On the web page it says you are using --min-level 8 --max-level 8. >>> >>> >>>> Each data point in the x axis represent a doubling in power. >>>> There are >>>> 13 doublings represented >>>> >>> This is a bit confusing. I think it's clearer to say there is 1 >>> baseline and 12 doublings. It's also confusing on the web page that >>> Mogo_01 actually corresponds to 0 doublings in the graph. >>> >>> So if I understand correctly: >>> >>> Mogo_13 = 64 * 2^12 = 262,144 simulations >>> FatMan_13 = 1024 * 2^12 = 4,194,304 simulations >>> >>> Sorry for the minor nitpicks. Looking forward to the results! >>> >>> -Jeff >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> computer-go mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
