Quoting Ivan Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Hello,

I think there is a very easy and straigthforward solution to the "nakade/seki" problem, here it is :

For moves that are self-atari on a group that contains MORE than 5 stones : Both in the tree and the playouts, strictly forbid them (exactly like you forbid filling an eye).
    (This is to handle seki and have efficient playouts).

For moves that are self-atari on a group that contains LESS than 5 stones : Allow them both in the tree and the playouts. In the playouts, they should be played with a low probability. But they should be played when there is no other move left. (This is to ensure groups with are dead with nakade are eventualy captured in "some" playouts).

What do you think about this solution ? I will probably implement it in Zoe to see if it efficient, unless someone finds a flaw in the logic.

Valkyria has a lot of logic about what self-ataris should be allowed or not, and the size of group is part of that.

I see two possible flaws in playing the remaining moves self ataris with low probability.

a) In some cases the group under attack will appear as alive because the nakade is always always captured in a way that creates a second eye. Just playing all moves with low probability does not mean that the right move is played. Also correct nakade handling means that some moves has to be played immediately as response to a liberty filling move from the other player.

b) You also have the problem of seki. Many nakade problems includes seki as a possibility in the search tree. And there are some common seki patterns involving just a few stones, so in some cases the probability of playing a move should be zero even with few stones.

I think the program need to either:

1) Implement proper logic for picking the correct moves
2) Learn from its mistakes, maybe hash every suicidal situation in the playouts played and store statistics.

But of course there are always room for any quick and dirty heuristics which actually improves the playing strength. It does not have to be perfect to work well.

-Magnus

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to