Indeed! That's part of the motivation of organizing the tournament at
the US Go Congress.
Perhaps we (or the subset of us within a given country) could just
pick an existing conference (something on machine learning or games)
and all go there...
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On Jul 30, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Łukasz Lew wrote:
It would be nice to have a workshop from time to time where we could
share our skills.
Lukasz
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:23, Darren Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a strong interest in seeing a 19x19 computer go program that
is
at least 3-dan by 2010. The recent jump in strength on the 9x9
board has
given me new hope and I want to ask people here, especially the
authors
of strong programs, what you now need to make the next jump in
strength.
There seem to be four broad categories:
* More hardware (CPU cycles? Memory? Faster networking? Do you just
need that hardware for offline tuning, or for playing too?)
* More data
* New algorithms (if so, to solve exactly what? evaluation? search?
other?)
* More community
By community I mean things like this mailing list, CGOS, open source
projects, etc.
By data I mean things like: game records, or board positions,
marked up
with correct/incorrect moves; game records generally; pattern
libraries;
test suites; opening libraries.
Darren
--
Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer
http://dcook.org/mlsn/ (English-Japanese-German-Chinese-Arabic
open source dictionary/semantic network)
http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work)
http://darrendev.blogspot.com/ (blog on php, flash, i18n, linux, ...)
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
