Darren Cook: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> It does not change the fact MoGo was developped by the programmers. >> And the fact the programmers spent many resources, like the people >> fighting at Beijing right now, to develop MoGo. > >And Kim was developed by his parents, his go teachers, go books, and >each opponent he has played against and learnt something from. But when >the game starts each is on his own, and you are just left with a human >with knowledge, and a machine with knowledge.
Mr. Kim was _created from scratch_ by his parents? :) >>>> I'm afraid it may raise unnecessary emotional thoughts of against >>>> computers among people. >>> People like that will get emotional whichever words you use. >> >> Don't you think it cannot be changed or, at least, improved? > >Yes, you should have it play across a board using this android to play >the moves: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4714135.stm > >It should smile sweetly, and flutter its eyelids across the board every >now and again. Yah, it's well known in Japan but I feel rather it's weird (some around me agree). >(In case anyone says I forgot the smiley, I'm being serious: people will >mind losing less to a pretty machine than losing to a cube of metal; >just as an elderly man would rather the above android helps them to the >toilet than something that looks R2-D2.) Interesting. Hideki -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
