> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 08:25 +0900, Darren Cook wrote:
>> And now I look at the ATS implementation of binary-trees, it is
using
>> threads, while the C++ version is single-threaded.
>>
>> Lots of apples and oranges comparisons here :-)
If you don't want to see quad-core look at the Q6600 measurements for
single core!
On 7-okt-08, at 21:40, Don Dailey wrote:
> And there is no single processor comparison number.
Really? Have you actually looked at the homepage to see what
measurements are available?
On Wed Oct 8 Mark Boon wrote:
> That's because those people advocating a certain language always
> have a vested interest in it looking faster than something else.
So tell me, what specific evidence do you have I'm advocating any
language in particular or have any vested interest?
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
