> ATS does the binary-trees test 6.2 times quicker than C++ but 2.7 times > slower on k-nucleotide (which seems to be about making hash tables):
Prompted by Isaac, I found the single-core benchmarks (change the "u64q" to "u32" in the URLs I posted before to get them, or start at http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/ ), ATS does binary trees 1.9 times quicker, and k-nucleotide 1.4 times slower. Darren > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ats&lang2=gpp > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=knucleotide&lang=all > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=knucleotide&lang=gpp&id=1 -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/mlsn/ (English-Japanese-German-Chinese-Arabic open source dictionary/semantic network) http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
