On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 13:38 +0100, Olivier Teytaud wrote: > But, it is also clearly established that the building of the opening > book by self-play > clearly works, whereas it is roughly the same idea. I guess the reason > is the > difference of strength of the player - a MCTS (Monte-Carlo Tree Search > - I don't > write UCT here as it is not UCT in mogo) built on top of a perfect > player should > be a perfect player (this is formally obvious). So perhaps for huge > computational > power, this approach (building MCTS on top of MCTS) is consistent.
I've always had this idea that the best way to build an opening book is the best way to build a general playing engine. You are trying to solve the same exact problem - what is the best move in this position? - Don
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
