Ah. I had always thought of "patterns" as translation-invariant.
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Magnus Persson wrote:
Probably 1x1 patterns implies that different priorities are assigned
to the absolute position of empty moves. AMAF can be seen this way.
AMAF learns statistics of 1x1 patterns if the move is played in the
playout but ignores all information surrounding the move at the time
it is played. Another example would be to have lower priorities for
the moves at the first and second line.
-Magnus
Quoting Peter Drake <[email protected]>:
I've seen reference in some papers to 1x1 patterns. What does that
even
mean? A point is either black, white, or vacant, and it's illegal to
play there unless it's vacant.
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
