On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Benjamin Teuber <benjamin.teu...@web.de>wrote:
> > It's not up to me to prove anything. It's up to you. > > You entered a discussion in which you gave arguments (that I believe > are nonsense) ... but at least fits the observation that this method does not work. > ... against this method, which I just meant to counter. Why don't you counter it with an argument that fits the actual observation? > > But I don't want to prove anything (well I might want, but I know I > cannot). > I'm really just curious about this good-sounding idea and hoped > somebody might be able to give details of its failure. There are some things in the archive on this - the idea is literally years old. But I doubt you will any papers on this since it's a failure. Paper authors tend to spend more time writing papers on things that work - unless they have some really surprising or interesting result to report. - Don > > > Cheers, Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
