I start with one move, and slowly add moves to the pool of moves to be considered, peaking at considering 30 moves.
My current schedule looks like: visits 0 2 5 9 15 24 38 59 90 100 ... 2142 moves 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 20 I didn't find that strength is very sensitive to the schedule. Many Faces is a pretty good heuristic for selecting good moves, so if you are just using RAVE to do move ordering you might need to widen faster. David > -----Original Message----- > From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go- > boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Petr Baudis > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:07 AM > To: computer-go@computer-go.org > Subject: [computer-go] Progressive widening vs unpruning > > Hi! > > I'm a little unclear on this, so I'd like to make sure I'm not missing > any important technique - is "progressive widening" and "progressive > unpruning" synonymous? > > I have looked both into the pMCTS and the CrazyStone papers and it > seems that "widening" differs from "unpruning" in that certain number of > simulations is first made before limiting the number of searches. Which > of the variants is commonly used? What "speed" of widening works for you > best? > > Thanks, > > -- > Petr "Pasky" Baudis > A lot of people have my books on their bookshelves. > That's the problem, they need to read them. -- Don Knuth > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
