Moreover, it might not be possible to explain the strong play in human understandable terms anyway; human rationalization might simply be a heuristic not strong enough to describe/capture it succinctly.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:21 PM Robert Jasiek <jas...@snafu.de> wrote: > On 14.03.2016 08:59, Jim O'Flaherty wrote: > > an AI player who becomes a better and better teacher. > > But you are aware that becoming a stronger AI player does not equal > becoming a stronger teacher? Teachers also need to (translate to and) > convey human knowledge and reasoning, and adapt to the specific pupils' > needs (incl. reasoning, subconscious thinking and psychology) while > interacting with human language specialised in go language. Solve two > dozen AI tasks, combine them and then, maybe, you get the equivalent of > a teacher. [FYI, I have taught 100+ regular single go pupils since 2008, > and groups of pupils.] > > -- > robert jasiek > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
