Great, thanks guys! On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Gian-Carlo Pascutto <g...@sjeng.org> wrote:
> On 7/11/2017 19:07, Imran Hendley wrote: > > Am I understanding this correctly? > > Yes. > > It's possible they had in-betweens or experimented with variations at > some point, then settled on the simplest case. You can vary the > randomness if you define it as a softmax with varying temperature, > that's harder if you only define the policy as select best or select > proportionally. > > -- > GCP > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
