It's interesting to leave unused parameters or unnecessary parameterizations in the paper. It telegraphs what was being tried as opposed to simply writing something more concise and leaving the reader to wonder why and how those decisions were made.
s. On Nov 7, 2017 10:54 PM, "Imran Hendley" <imran.hend...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great, thanks guys! > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Gian-Carlo Pascutto <g...@sjeng.org> wrote: > >> On 7/11/2017 19:07, Imran Hendley wrote: >> > Am I understanding this correctly? >> >> Yes. >> >> It's possible they had in-betweens or experimented with variations at >> some point, then settled on the simplest case. You can vary the >> randomness if you define it as a softmax with varying temperature, >> that's harder if you only define the policy as select best or select >> proportionally. >> >> -- >> GCP >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
