>My concern about many of these points of comparison is that they presume how >AZ scales. In the absence of data, I would guess that AZ gains much less from >hardware than SF. I am basing this guess on >two known facts. First is that AZ >did not lose a game, so the upper bound on its strength is perfection. Second, >AZ is a knowledge intensive program, so it is counting on judgement to a >larger degree.
Doesn't Figure 2 in the paper indicate convincingly that AZ scales better than Stockfish? Rémi _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
