On 7/12/2017 13:20, Brian Sheppard via Computer-go wrote: > The conversation on Stockfish's mailing list focused on how the > match was imbalanced.
Which is IMHO missing the point a bit ;-) > My concern about many of these points of comparison is that they > presume how AZ scales. In the absence of data, I would guess that AZ > gains much less from hardware than SF. I am basing this guess on two > known facts. First is that AZ did not lose a game, so the upper > bound on its strength is perfection. Second, AZ is a knowledge > intensive program, so it is counting on judgement to a larger > degree. What about the data point that AlphaGo Zero gained 2100 Elo from its tree search? In a game commonly considered less tactical? -- GCP _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
